![]() ![]() She also specified that "nothing in this decision prevents the three remaining family members from claiming against Air Canada for their delayed flight, subject to the applicable limitation period." DELAY WAS WITHIN AIRLINE'S CONTROLįor its part, Air Canada told the tribunal it shouldn't have to pay the family, arguing that the delay that caused them to miss a connecting flight was outside its control. Lopez awarded the two named applicants – Abdallah Mohamed and Ghada Ali – $1,000 each, plus pre-judgment interest and CRT fees. "Given I find the APPR’s compensation scheme is based on a passenger’s entitlement, I find the applicants have no standing to claim compensation for their 3 other family members." "Here, the two named applicants claim a total of $5,000 in APPR compensation for not just themselves, but also their 3 other family members travelling with them," wrote tribunal vice chair Shelley Lopez, in the decision. The reason two members of the five-person party were eligible for compensation and the other three weren't – according to the Civil Resolution Tribunal decision posted online Tuesday – is that passengers can only claim payment under Canada's Air Passenger Protection Regulations for delays they experience themselves, not for delays experienced by others. B.C.'s small claims tribunal has ordered Air Canada to compensate two passengers whose arrival in Egypt was delayed by more than 56 hours, while three other family members who were travelling with them have been denied compensation for now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |